I rise today in strong opposition to the Kasich substitute to the House budget resolution. I believe it would be a painful step backward--at a time when we must keep moving forward. One year ago, in this very Chamber, when we passed President Clinton's first budget, we voted for fiscal responsibility--for fiscal sanity. We said we had to start making the tough choices--reining in the runaway spending and borrowing, the lop-sided policies that favored the rich over middle-class America--policies that had been a proud Republican legacy. We said it was time for the wealthiest handful of Americans to pay their fair share--instead of soaking up huge tax cuts while hard-working American families watched their paychecks grow smaller and smaller. We said it was time for basic fairness--fairness to the families that sent us here in the first place. Fairness to the families who know that, for all the Republican rhetoric about 'big government' and 'tax and spend,' Democrats have been fighting for them for decades. And for a dozen years of Reagan and Bush, it was clearly an uphill battle. Today, we can choose to continue down that path of fairness and fiscal responsibility. A path that has brought more new jobs, and higher economic growth, than in all the Bush years. A path that has brought a lower deficit, and lower interest rates--lower than we have seen in years.
Richard Gephardt: “I rise today in strong opposition to the Kasich substitute to the House budget resolution. I believe it would be a…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Kasich substitute to the House budget resolution during a floor debate.
Share
More from Richard Gephardt
I have tried to put myself in the shoes of an average citizen, and I think it is gobbledygook, and I do not understand what they are talking about. But that really is the magic of this place. As the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) said…
with this resolution today the House of Representatives is standing in solidarity with the people of Israel and for peace in the Middle East. We are defending a people, a democracy, and a friend that shares our commitment to the universal…
Who is he talking about? Is he saying labor unions or special interests or the senior citizens or the farmers? I don't think so. So I just -- I think these are not accurate comments. I don't understand them.
I rise to urge Members to vote ``no'' against this rule. Over 1 year ago, Republicans passed an economic plan. They said at the time that their plan would generate economic growth, protect the surplus that we built up in the 1990s, and…





