But to have a dispute resolution wherein FERC has the final say, if this were a neutral dispute resolution process with an arbitrator or a mediator or something, someone not part of FERC, I would be more interested and enthusiastic, but to say there will be a dispute resolution and FERC, who disagrees with the State, will get to determine the resolution is going back to the fox guarding the chickenhouse.
Norvell Emerson: “But to have a dispute resolution wherein FERC has the final say, if this were a neutral dispute resolution process with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a neutral dispute resolution process in conflicts between state and federal agencies.
Share
More from Norvell Emerson
I commend the gentleman and appreciate very much his explanation of the whole issue of safety, because we have got to get a handle on this issue once and for all, and I cannot bear to tell my constituents one more time that if they go to…
I represent a district whose mainstay is agriculture, and for the last 4 years and now going into our fifth year our farmers are in very, very bad straits. As a matter of fact, I would agree with the gentlewoman from Florida when she says…
the judge said that they hold that the Hatch-Waxman amendments that already exist to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act require the labeling be used, be given by the drug manufacturer to the generic which means then, or to the reimporter in…
today we may be voting on a measure to open American markets to the reimportation of prescription drugs. I say we may be voting because, as a Member of this House, I have never seen an issue so important to me, to our colleagues, and to…





