The fact is, and again I respect those that bring the green eye shade approach here, keeping in mind, of course, that the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Tax do not take into account the economic benefits that are going to happen from small businesses being able to invest. But even assuming the numbers, we have on-budget surpluses; in the most recent numbers, on-budget surpluses in the year that this permanent tax cut kicks in. If we really want to talk about numbers, the fact is that if we do nothing, nearly 4 million people that are now off the tax rolls are going to be put back on them, and 3 million of those are families with kids. So I would urge that we vote in favor of this measure.
Kenny Hulshof: “The fact is, and again I respect those that bring the green eye shade approach here, keeping in mind, of course, that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic impact of a proposed permanent tax cut.
Share
More from Kenny Hulshof
I would like to amplify the point by my colleague from Wisconsin and coauthor of this bill to sunset the sunset. It is interesting that a New York Times columnist, as he was commenting on the work that we had done, and finally we were…
Last January, I was granted the privilege to enter this chamber for the first time. My family beamed down at me with pride from the gallery as I began my service to this nation. On that day I rose in unison with my colleagues and pledged…
Just a quick comment for whatever time I may consume before yielding to the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Barrett). Did I hear the last speaker correctly, that we have given away, whose money is that? It would be the American…
I again believe that a compromise is, in fact, achievable. Just a couple of points... I would take issue with the gentleman's comment that Congress has not been doing its work as far as working families with those prior examples and again…





