I appreciate my friend from Montana and his eloquent words, particularly with the AMT provision as it was penalizing farmers, the IRS, as you pointed out, changing rules in the middle of the game. I know that this actually occurred in a case up in Washington State where a farm family was audited. And because the IRS decided that if you defer your contract payments, in other words, when you take your grain to market and you get the check at the grain elevator, normally that is when income is derived according to the cash basis accounting system; that the IRS decided, no, not when you deliver your grain to market but when you enter into the contract in the preceding calendar year, that is when that deferred payment is subject to income.
Kenny Hulshof: “I appreciate my friend from Montana and his eloquent words, particularly with the AMT provision as it was penalizing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of IRS rules on farmers during a debate on tax policy.
Share
More from Kenny Hulshof
Just a quick comment for whatever time I may consume before yielding to the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Barrett). Did I hear the last speaker correctly, that we have given away, whose money is that? It would be the American…
There is so much about this tax cut package that is to like. The beauty of this particular provision is that we want to take 90 percent of the projected surplus and put it aside to save Social Security; surplus funds, not monies needed to…
Last January, I was granted the privilege to enter this chamber for the first time. My family beamed down at me with pride from the gallery as I began my service to this nation. On that day I rose in unison with my colleagues and pledged…
The amount that H.R. 5203 would add to the budget deficit this year: zero. The amount that H.R. 5203 would add to the budget deficit of next year: zero. The amount that H.R. 5203 would add to the budget deficit in the next 6, 7 years…





