On the recordApril 8, 2022
We`re talking about 8-year-olds and 9-year-olds, 11-year-olds, and 12-year-olds. But you say this does not signal a heinous or egregious child pornography offense.
Source
msnbc.comJosh Hawley: “We`re talking about 8-year-olds and 9-year-olds, 11-year-olds, and 12-year-olds. But you say this does not signal a…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's views on child pornography offenses during her confirmation hearings.
Share
More from Josh Hawley
Oct 1, 2026
At the end of the day, they’re a product, and if you make that product in a reckless kind of way, and that product causes … significant harm and damage — they crash a hospital ER, they shut down a bank so that folks can’t get their money —…
Sep 30, 2026
The hearing exposed the 'threat' AI-powered cameras could pose to 'national security and privacy of everyday Americans.
Sep 30, 2026
If that’s what the House is able to pass, I’m certainly happy to take that and to work with it.
Other voices in this conversation
