my second question deals with Section 17 that requires the Director, 24 months after the date of enactment of this act, to submit a report to Congress reviewing this act to ensure that awards under the act are made to individuals and institutions that are in compliance with the Immigration and Nationality Act. I assume this is a simple reporting requirement similar to other reports to Congress by the NSF and that it is not meant to require the Director to enforce our Nation's immigration laws?
Jim Baird: “my second question deals with Section 17 that requires the Director, 24 months after the date of enactment of this act…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a reporting requirement related to compliance with the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Share
More from Jim Baird
I am a decorated Army combat veteran who served in the Vietnam war. I know how well and how much the sacrifices our servicemembers make to defend our Nation. Access to timely healthcare for our veterans is mission critical for the VA, and…
I rise to honor Steve Reeder, a dedicated local historian and the chair of the social studies department at Monrovia High School. He has taught at Monrovia High School for over 25 years. Steve spent nearly 2 years researching and writing…
I rise to honor Phil Deckard, the former mayor of Martinsville, Indiana, who passed away at the end of last year. Phil dedicated 57 years of his life to public service and leadership in Morgan County and served four terms as the mayor of…
I rise today to discuss how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes American energy dominant again by resuming leasing for domestic energy production. This includes onshore and offshore oil and gas leases as well as coal leases. The One Big…





