the gentlewoman raises a perfectly legitimate point about the family foresters. The bulk of the family foresters in my district would be perfectly well covered under the $6 million exemption. I have met with them. I meet with their association. They would be covered under the Pomeroy exemption. What they would not be covered under is any relief from sales tax which is unjust. And the gentlewoman ought to join me in that effort and fix that.
Jim Baird: “the gentlewoman raises a perfectly legitimate point about the family foresters. The bulk of the family foresters in my…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the coverage of family foresters under tax exemptions.
Share
More from Jim Baird
I thank Congresswoman Houlahan for her dedication to improving STEM education and for being a great partner to work with on advancing this bill. Mr. Speaker, the Mathematical and Statistical Modeling Education Act provides a much-needed…
When we talk about land for farmers and ranchers, we are really talking about that top eight inches of soil, which for some of you that may not recognize, that we consider that a living, breathing organism because of the organisms there…
Every single day, our brave men and women in blue leave their families not knowing if they will return home. During National Police Week, we pause to show our gratitude for our law enforcement officers and recognize the sacrifices that…
I rise to honor Joe Root, who has served Clinton County as a veteran service officer for 25 years and served with the Clinton County Sheriff's Office for 20 years. He served in the United States Marine Corps from 1966 to 1970 and…





