On the recordJune 6, 2023
We do. But we have a reason for putting it at the age where it is least hurtful for the very people we are trying to help.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Baird emphasizes the importance of maintaining the current age limit for work requirements.
Share & report
More from Jim Baird
Jun 6, 2023
Let me just share with you why I oppose moving from the 49 years of age that we have the work requirements.
Apr 17, 2023
What is really important is that there is a regulatory framework, that it supports innovation and safety, and that it provides certainty for developers.
Apr 17, 2023
I always appreciate the expert witnesses that we have for these Committee meetings and the value that you add for sharing with us what you think is important.
Other voices in this conversation
