I will say about my colleagues, that most people who believe out there that people in the Senate don't have convictions are wrong. That is why we are here at 4 in the morning. That is the one thing that unites us. We are here because we have convictions. The other reason, which is what I really think is working here, is out of conviction, the sense that these nominees they are filibustering or threatening to filibuster are somehow too extreme. We all know what they mean when they say that. We use codes here. It means they are too extreme on social issues. Those who are filibustering disagree with these nominees on the social issues, and particularly, let's say it, that one big social issue: abortion.
James M. Talent: “I will say about my colleagues, that most people who believe out there that people in the Senate don't have convictions…”
On the recordNovember 12, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the motivations behind Senate filibusters of judicial nominees.
Share
More from James M. Talent
Oct 28, 2019
I certainly agree that these are vital concerns, given the power of cyber weapons, their escalatory potential, and the downside consequences of a miscalculation.
Oct 28, 2019
I think the top-level political authority, which you all represent, what is it you want the outcome of this to be and why?
May 2, 2017
What we were hearing back is a greater and greater level of frustration that the system doesn't seem to understand what they're dealing with.
May 2, 2017
We fear our military lacks the capability to attract, use, and keep the unconventional, technical, and cutting-edge talents and skills that it needs to meet future threats and new realities.





