I heard that statement many times in this debate, and it gives rise to the question naturally: ``Why isn't the bill broad enough to include all kinds of violence on the picket lines?'' Mr. Speaker, the gentleman is on the committee that produced this bill. What is the reasons given by the sponsors? Maybe I should ask one of them. What are the reasons given by the sponsors why they do not cover all kinds of violence?
Questioning the scope of a bill regarding violence on picket lines during a debate.
Share
More from James M. Talent
Part of what you are doing and need to do is to strengthen the civilian elements of national influence.
I am concerned that this is real and that they are, the latest developments are reflective of what is actually happening and that they may be well ahead of us.
More than ever, the U.S. military must fully engage the entirety of American society, not only to expand the military's access to talent, but to also reconnect the Nation to its military.
We fear our military lacks the capability to attract, use, and keep the unconventional, technical, and cutting-edge talents and skills that it needs to meet future threats and new realities.
Other voices in this conversation
