In relevant part, it refers to the three funding initiatives in the bill, and then says each of these three elements of the initiative is critical and each must be retained in the final bill. That is on behalf of the administration. I think that makes clear the administration is strongly supportive of all three aspects of this measure and feels they are a package, and I think that is true. That is how all of us who support this measure feel. I know suggestions have been made with regard to Mayor Williams' support of this measure, that it was somehow foisted upon him by somebody or some group. I refer the Senate to an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, and I also ask unanimous consent that it be printed in the Record.
James M. Talent: “In relevant part, it refers to the three funding initiatives in the bill, and then says each of these three elements of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the administration's support for funding initiatives in urban education.
Share
More from James M. Talent
I certainly agree that these are vital concerns, given the power of cyber weapons, their escalatory potential, and the downside consequences of a miscalculation.
I think success means protecting the American homeland, the territorial integrity of allies, the economy, from attacks.
I think the top-level political authority, which you all represent, what is it you want the outcome of this to be and why?
But it is really important because the impact of the next 8 to 10 years, particularly in that theater, if they are able--I don't have to tell you all--to operationalize hypersonics, we have trouble because our missile defenses go out the…





