There is a major difference. Under our bill, you do not have to die first. You can sue to get the treatment that you need. Because the emphasis here, and I appreciate the gentleman's comments, I say, in all good faith, the emphasis here is on giving people the care they need when they need it. We want people in the treatment room, not in the courtroom. I would anticipate that very few people would have to go to court. Because we have changed the incentives in this bill for these HMOs. For the very same reason that they have been denying care in the past, they are going to be granting care now because they are going to know, it is going to end up costing them more money if they deny the care up front. So I would anticipate that few people would have to go to court. But that hammer is there. If they spin people along, if they do not pay when they are supposed to pay, you go to court right away. In fact, as the gentleman knows, you can go to court up front in an emergency situation to get an injunction, an emergency injunction to order them to pay.
James M. Talent: “There is a major difference. Under our bill, you do not have to die first. You can sue to get the treatment that you…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing healthcare reform and patient rights in relation to HMOs.
Share
More from James M. Talent
My understanding of the science--and I will certainly invite Dr. Cairns and the deputy commissioner to weigh in here--is that probably, of the three, the weaponizing it would be the most difficult but, nevertheless, within the capability…
I will devote my time to a substantive and very important subject-- the appropriate level of funding for America's military. It is an issue that I have worked on and fought for since I went to the House of Representatives in 1993. I am…
I believe in the dignity and value of life at all stages. I strongly supported the ban on partial-birth abortions. My opponent opposed it.
BARDA has been underfunded. It is being funded at a fraction of what it needs.





