We are in the midst of another filibuster. I say that because if I didn't say it, given the Senate procedures, it would not be evident to people that that is what is happening. But we are filibustering yet another measure before the Senate. This one has a little twist to it. Those who are filibustering are willing to allow us to go to a vote on the amendment, if we have no amendment to the amendment. In other words, if nobody wants to offer any amendment to change this amendment at all, to try and perfect it, then they will permit an immediate vote. So what we are told is that we must either have an immediate vote without any changes even being considered or no vote at all. I suspect that the filibuster will be sustained when we vote on it. It is a shame because this is an important measure, and the people are entitled to see who in this body is for protecting traditional marriage and who is not, because nothing less than that is at stake.
James M. Talent: “We are in the midst of another filibuster. I say that because if I didn't say it, given the Senate procedures, it would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a filibuster regarding an amendment related to traditional marriage.
Share
More from James M. Talent
I supported the marriage amendment to the United States Constitution, and my opponent didn't. I supported the ban on partial birth abortions. She's opposed to that.
My understanding of the science--and I will certainly invite Dr. Cairns and the deputy commissioner to weigh in here--is that probably, of the three, the weaponizing it would be the most difficult but, nevertheless, within the capability…
But it is really important because the impact of the next 8 to 10 years, particularly in that theater, if they are able--I don't have to tell you all--to operationalize hypersonics, we have trouble because our missile defenses go out the…
The foundation of America's military strength is the quality and morale of the men and women who have chosen to service.





