Nominees deserve a vote. If our Republican colleagues don't like them, vote against them. But don't just sit on them-- that is obstruction of justice. Free and full debate over judicial nominations is healthy. The Constitution is clear that only individuals acceptable to both the President and the Senate should be confirmed. The President and the Senate do not always agree. But we should resolve these disagreements by voting on these nominees--yes or no. We should resolve these disagreements by voting on these nominees-- yes or no. The divisiveness over nominations, holding them up in one way or another, is not new to this Senate. This tactic of abusing the filibuster rule for a minority to stop court of appeals judges from even getting a vote, that is new; that is unprecedented.
James M. Talent: “Nominees deserve a vote. If our Republican colleagues don't like them, vote against them. But don't just sit on them…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of voting on judicial nominations during Senate debate.
Share
More from James M. Talent
But it is really important because the impact of the next 8 to 10 years, particularly in that theater, if they are able--I don't have to tell you all--to operationalize hypersonics, we have trouble because our missile defenses go out the…
What we were hearing back is a greater and greater level of frustration that the system doesn't seem to understand what they're dealing with.
I am concerned that this is real and that they are, the latest developments are reflective of what is actually happening and that they may be well ahead of us.
More than ever, the U.S. military must fully engage the entirety of American society, not only to expand the military's access to talent, but to also reconnect the Nation to its military.





