If the gentleman wants to put it in there, an exception for self-defense, then I would say yes. But the gentleman does not have that in here. He just says anybody who knowingly and with intent, with reckless disregard for the safety of another.
Discussing provisions related to self-defense in a legislative proposal.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
It is time and the time is now that the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Nancy ``Stonewall'' Johnson, release that report on Speaker Gingrich so that we can all know what is in it. I do not know what is in it…
Is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
We have just been through a little charade here in the House. The last two votes on motions to table were purely what I call a charade as part of the total coverup that is going on in the ethics investigation of our Speaker. You know…
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
Other voices in this conversation
