Members of the House, this morning during my 1-minute speech, I chastised the Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, for not telling exactly the truth this morning on one of the talk show programs when he was being interviewed in regard to President Clinton's State of the Union Message last night, because Speaker Gingrich said, in answer to a question as to whether the President was really for welfare reform, that the President had vetoed welfare reform twice and that one time he had vetoed a bill that had passed the Senate by 85 votes. Now, when I brought out this morning that that bill, that bill that the President vetoed, had only gotten 52 votes in the Senate, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Stearns] got in the well and said, well that is the same bill; that that bill got 87 votes in September and it got 52 votes in December. Mr. Speaker, I say to the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Stearns], it is not the same bill. I think the gentleman should learn legislative procedure.
Harold Volkmer: “Members of the House, this morning during my 1-minute speech, I chastised the Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, for…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing inaccuracies in Speaker Gingrich's comments about President Clinton's welfare reform vetoes.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
That report, it is a report by any other name is a report, ought to be published and the Members of this House ought to know what is in it. More importantly, the American public ought to know what is in it.
these words were spoken by a Member of this House several years ago: The 435 Members of the House should look at all the facts, should have available to them all the reports and all the background documents, and the American people should…
we have just been through a little charade here in the House. The last two votes on motions to table were purely what I call a charade as part of the total coverup that is going on in the ethics investigation of our Speaker. You know…





