It is very apparent to me, listening to the debate, that the gentleman from Colorado is trying to obfuscate the real issue. We all agree that we will take up the appropriation bill that will finally fund the Government for the rest of this year. That should have been done 7 months ago, but the Republicans did not do it. The real issue is whether we will have two things to do. One is a minimum wage, and the other is the appropriation bill. We can do both. All we have to do is defeat the previous question. We could tell Speaker Gingrich and the gentleman from Texas, Dick Armey, 'Sorry, boys, we are going to vote on a minimum wage in the House of Representatives. We are going to defeat the previous question.' If Members are not for the minimum wage, they will vote for the previous question. If they are for the minimum wage, they will vote against the previous question. It is a very easy vote. And, by defeating the previous question, we amend the rule. The rule then passes. We have passed the appropriation bill. We send it to the President. The Government keeps on running. And soon thereafter, because of this amendment, we will be voting on a minimum wage. That is what we should be doing. What is wrong with the Speaker?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a minimum wage and the appropriation bill during House debate.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
the House and Senate have passed a minimum wage bill, but I want to let my colleagues in on a little secret. The Speaker is not going to let it become law. Our dictator, Speaker Gingrich, has decided that along with the majority Members of…
That explains why it was not in the bill when it passed the House and the Senate.
I say it is a huge waste of taxpayer's money to spend $500,000 to have a very good attorney to gather up all this evidence and give it to the committee, which the committee already had, and if it is not a report, then I do not know what it…
I appreciate the ruling of the Chair, and it is very apparent to me and, I hope, to Members of this House that the majority does not want any of the minority, anybody, talking about ethics questions on the floor of the House. They just do…





