But I do think you can tighten the purposes up quite a bit more and narrow them quite a bit more than you have done. What we have attempted to do and some of us feel that one of the major items facing this Nation, especially in our major metropolitan areas, is the fact that they cannot afford the police that they need. They cannot afford the police that we need. So you take the police away. You say, ``Well, you can have an option,'' but you reduce the amount that can be used totally from the present law into this, what can be used for police, if every bit of this money in your bill was used for the police.
Harold Volkmer: “But I do think you can tighten the purposes up quite a bit more and narrow them quite a bit more than you have done.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing police funding challenges in major metropolitan areas.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Mr. Chairman, I think that it would be worthwhile for some of the Members to know why many of us on this side of the aisle are not going to vote for this bill. I know that the gentleman from New Mexico, who I very strongly support in all…
Yesterday was a big day for a lot of low-income American people that are hard working. The other body passed the minimum wage increase bill overwhelmingly. All the media talked about it, what a great thing it was for the low-income…
it is budget time again. Once again, I hear my extreme radical Republican colleagues, under the gentleman from Georgia, Newt Gingrich, and Bob Dole telling the American public they are going to save Medicare. How are they going to do that…
I believe it is time for Members of this House to stand up to intimidation. A letter has been sent from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means, Mr. Archer, to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Ms. Richardson…





