So what we are saying is that the Federal Government should pay for what other people, whether it is private industry, whether it is communities, should pay to do what they should have done anyway, what they should have done on their own without the Federal Government telling them what to do, unless proponents of this bill really believe that we should not do anything on safety, health, as far as pollution itself, and that we should just let the local communities do what they want to do, and if they or the industries, they want to pollute, they can go ahead and pollute, and it is only when the Federal Government says, ``We will pay for what you should not do anyway,'' that it is going to be cleaned up. So I think this legislation needs a heck of a lot more time than it is getting.
Harold Volkmer: “So what we are saying is that the Federal Government should pay for what other people, whether it is private industry…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal funding for pollution control legislation.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
the Republican majority, under the imperial Speaker, the gentleman from Georgia, Newt Gingrich, have become very upset when we look at their policies, and we call them and their policies extreme and radical. They get very upset. Are they…
Now the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Linder] goes on and says that the Lewis resolution reflected an ongoing and desperate action with a small band of Democrats who refused the ethics process by filing one baseless claim after another. Now…
Yes, and by the way, for the public's edification, no Democratic member of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct can tell us what is in that report. The Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, as a body, has to release it. So…
it is very apparent, I think, to everybody out there that is seeing what is happening here, that Members of the House who are calling for this report to be made public are attempted to be gagged.





