Recently, there has been a lot of talk in this body about the appropriate Federal role in funding technology development, much of it coming from the other side of the aisle as an attack on what is called corporate welfare. This criticism is generally directed at programs that were started in the Reagan and Bush administrations, but which have been greatly expanded in this administration as a useful way to develop good, high-technology jobs in the future. I am talking here about programs like the Advanced Technology Program at the Department of Commerce and the Technology Reinvestment Program at the Department of Defense. The Hydrogen Future Act is the first bill we have considered this year that would expand industry-Government partnerships in technology development. On its face, this bill seems to be aimed at promoting programs which are very similar to ATP or TRP.
Harold Volkmer: “Recently, there has been a lot of talk in this body about the appropriate Federal role in funding technology…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Federal role in technology funding and the Hydrogen Future Act.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
Now, as my colleagues know, I have been reading about this, and I admire the gentleman from Pennsylvania, and up to Wednesday night I would say he helped grow that beautiful bouquet of flowers. But I would like to quote the gentleman from…
I would like to tell the Members that I have had an opportunity since we first started on this to look at this 33-page bill. As I look through this bill, I find page 1 through 13 has to do with airport and aviation safety. Those are…
I rise to strongly urge Members to vote to override the President's veto on this legislation. This legislation is much-needed if we are going to save the thousands of children who are killed unnecessarily each year by this procedure. There…





