They are not federally illegal. What you are telling me is if a local city body decides that there are not going to be any guns, as the gentleman has in Illinois, there are not going to be any guns in this community, none whatsoever, and I have a gun in that community and it is in a public housing project, I have a Federal offense of 5 years, not just a violation of a local ordnance. That is the other objection I have to it. I do not believe that we should make every local ordnance a Federal offense if it involves guns in a public housing project. No, I do not believe that.
Harold Volkmer: “They are not federally illegal. What you are telling me is if a local city body decides that there are not going to be…”
On the recordMay 9, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of local gun ordinances and federal law.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Sep 24, 1996
Is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
Sep 27, 1996
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
Sep 19, 1996
We have just been through a little charade here in the House. The last two votes on motions to table were purely what I call a charade as part of the total coverup that is going on in the ethics investigation of our Speaker. You know…
Sep 27, 1996
That explains why it was not in the bill when it passed the House and the Senate.





