If they have a warrant; if they have a warrant. If they do not have a warrant, as your bill permits it, they do not have to have a warrant to break into that house, and if the warrant is defective, even under the Supreme Court, which I disagree with, the evidence can possibly be used.
Harold Volkmer: “If they have a warrant; if they have a warrant. If they do not have a warrant, as your bill permits it, they do not have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about warrantless searches in relation to proposed legislation.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
I say it is a huge waste of taxpayer's money to spend $500,000 to have a very good attorney to gather up all this evidence and give it to the committee, which the committee already had, and if it is not a report, then I do not know what it…
Well, Mr. Speaker, now it appears that the Speaker can get up and say that, ``I have been exonerated by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct from all these charges,'' and I cannot stand down here and correct the record. Boy, oh…
one newspaper in Connecticut appropriately describes the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct as ``Stonewall Johnson.'' That is a perfect, appropriate description of the gentlewoman from Connecticut, and she has…
I appreciate the ruling of the Chair, and it is very apparent to me and, I hope, to Members of this House that the majority does not want any of the minority, anybody, talking about ethics questions on the floor of the House. They just do…





