some transparency is not going to hurt anything here. American people understanding more about how this works is not going to hurt anything.
Claire McCaskill: “some transparency is not going to hurt anything here. American people understanding more about how this works is not…”
Editor's note · Context
McCaskill argues for more transparency in the Supreme Court's processes.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
I don`t think so. I do not believe that there will be enough votes to do that, but I do think there is an opportunity to talk about a lot of ethics reform, term limits, and maybe age limits since the idea of a lifelong appointment I think…
First, people were put on the court with a political two by four wielded by Mitch McConnell. First by denying a sitting president an opportunity to name a Supreme Court justice, first time in history.
Well, first, I want everybody to slow down a little bit. We are still the underdogs in this election. And I am speaking as someone in 2018, we picked up 40 seats in the House but we still lost four senators.
He thought everything that was in the White House belonged to him, including the office. You know, he thought the office of the presidency was his. He didn`t realize it didn`t belong to him.





