I do not believe it intended to shield anyone for responsibility for serious Federal crimes, much less sex trafficking.
Claire McCaskill: “I do not believe it intended to shield anyone for responsibility for serious Federal crimes, much less sex trafficking.”
Editor's note · Context
McCaskill critiques the Communications Decency Act's implications for trafficking.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
I think the filibuster is on life support. And I think if the Democrats pick up more seats, I think it will probably go away.
This is never a referendum. Presidential elections, by the time they run around, is always, 'well, who do you like slightly better than the two you don't like?' So it is a binary choice.
The culture wars? I've got to tell you, this time around, bring it, because I think that Democrats want to talk about abortion, and they want to talk about guns.
I don`t think so. I do not believe that there will be enough votes to do that, but I do think there is an opportunity to talk about a lot of ethics reform, term limits, and maybe age limits since the idea of a lifelong appointment I think…





