In the old days, judge decisions were not so narrow, especially for a trial judge. I mean a 49 to 41 vote is very unusual but once McConnell blew up the norms by refusing to hear the nominee of a duly elected president months before an election, then all bets were off and it became a very political exercise.
Claire McCaskill: “In the old days, judge decisions were not so narrow, especially for a trial judge. I mean a 49 to 41 vote is very…”
On the recordApril 18, 2022
Source
msnbc.comEditor's note · Context
McCaskill reflects on the changes in judicial nominations and the political implications of Mitch McConnell's actions.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
Sep 12, 2022
Third, he`s got a guy sitting on the Supreme Court whose wife is helping plot to overthrow the government.
Nov 5, 2022
I have won when the polls said I couldn't and I have lost when the polls said I would win, so I am not a big believer in all of the horse race stuff.
Apr 29, 2023
Oh I think – you cannot compare DeSantis to people who have been tested on a national stage, like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. This guy's not ready. He declared war, and he doesn't even know what victory is, against Mickey Mouse. Give…





