Yes. And it is as plain as the nose on his face that he should have recused himself under the law. The question is an enforcement mechanism. And the Supreme Court does not think they need a enforcement mechanism. Well, I disagree, clearly they do. Clearly they need someone enforcing the rule because Clarence Thomas did not think it applied to him. And that is very dangerous, especially on the highest court of the land.
McCaskill emphasizes the importance of recusal for Supreme Court justices and criticizes Clarence Thomas for not adhering to the law.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
This is not Joe Biden. We have some of the least inflation in the developed world.
I'm always optimistic. And I do think this is brutal. And people who think that body cams on police officers are not doing what they should, I get that. This young man died. But we now know exactly what happened. So, it does make a…
There is an over-classification problem, and I was surprised Secretary Gates didn't mention it.
Other voices in this conversation
