Considering how well the F/A-18 program has delivered advanced capability and the potential of the Super Hornet, along with the high return the U.S. taxpayer has received for the funds invested in the F/A-18 program, do you think it's prudent to take funds away from the program to invest in other tenuous tactical aviation programs, as some of my colleagues have recently advocated?
Claire McCaskill: “Considering how well the F/A-18 program has delivered advanced capability and the potential of the Super Hornet, along…”
Editor's note · Context
McCaskill defends the F/A-18 Super Hornet program against funding cuts.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
The culture wars? I've got to tell you, this time around, bring it, because I think that Democrats want to talk about abortion, and they want to talk about guns.
The suburban women of America. And Marco Rubio is one of many candidates who thinks the government should force birth on a victim of incest. That is not going to fly with American women. And I think they’re going to turn out.
Well, first, I want everybody to slow down a little bit. We are still the underdogs in this election. And I am speaking as someone in 2018, we picked up 40 seats in the House but we still lost four senators.
I think it would be very hard for him, with the abortion -- anti-abortion forces in this country that are totally Republican, I think it would be very hard for him to not let there be a vote.





