Let's look at this source selection sensitive limitation and what seems to be an arbitrary length for protection, which is 3 years.
Claire McCaskill: “Let's look at this source selection sensitive limitation and what seems to be an arbitrary length for protection, which…”
Editor's note · Context
McCaskill questions the arbitrary nature of the 3-year protection period for sensitive information.
Share
More from Claire McCaskill
I'm always optimistic. And I do think this is brutal. And people who think that body cams on police officers are not doing what they should, I get that. This young man died. But we now know exactly what happened. So, it does make a…
I don`t think so. I do not believe that there will be enough votes to do that, but I do think there is an opportunity to talk about a lot of ethics reform, term limits, and maybe age limits since the idea of a lifelong appointment I think…
This is never a referendum. Presidential elections, by the time they run around, is always, 'well, who do you like slightly better than the two you don't like?' So it is a binary choice.
Our democracy is in peril. If our party keeps putting people forward that refuse to accept the results of elections.





