Which is best (supposing your case) to have a total separation, or a change of the seat of government?--It by no means follows, that promoting and advancing the landed interest in America will depress that of Britain: the contrary has always been the fact.
Benjamin Franklin: “Which is best (supposing your case) to have a total separation, or a change of the seat of government?--It by no means…”
Editor's note · Context
Franklin poses a rhetorical question about the implications of separating or relocating the government, suggesting that promoting American interests can benefit Britain as well.
Share
More from Benjamin Franklin
This is a measure that will be effectual; and will not only in time pay its expence, but make as great returns as any of our present colonies do; will give a strength and unity to our dominions in North America; and give us possession of…
Taxes paid in Britain by the landholder or artificer must enter into and increase the price of the produce of land and manufactures made of it; and great part of this is paid by consumers in the colonies, who thereby pay a considerable…
I have seen generations born, flourish, and expire.
We are obliged to carry a great part of our produce directly to Britain; and where the duties laid upon it lessen its price to the planter, or it sells for less than it would in foreign markets, the difference is a tax paid to Britain.





