I want to take time this morning to talk about one of the most important issues I think is facing American society today; that is, the future of the retirement system in this country--not only for those who are on Social Security today or for those who are going to be on Social Security very soon, but basically to look down the road to our children and our grandchildren at what kind of Social Security or a retirement system we are going to leave the next generation. I think that is very important. I am very pleased this morning that President Clinton has finally accepted the Republican Social Security lockbox which would lock in every penny of the Social Security surplus, not for tax relief and not for Government spending but for the retirement program of millions of Americans. However, what most concerns me is that the President appears to be abandoning his ``Save Social Security First'' pledge. It was one thing to lock in Social Security surpluses last year and in the future and to further attempt to devote interest savings on a lower public debt to Social Security, but that alone will not save Social Security because we have spent too many years of the Social Security surplus prior to the year 2000. The President's budget does not address the future solvency of Social Security to ensure retirement benefits will be there for the baby boomers and also future generations.
Rod Grams: “I want to take time this morning to talk about one of the most important issues I think is facing American society…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the future of the retirement system and Social Security during a floor speech.
Share
More from Rod Grams
I wanted to take time before leaving for the weekend to be here to express my strong disappointment with President Clinton and his Democratic allies in the Congress who have once again denied millions of American couples marriage penalty…
My understanding is that in order to be a part of the Vice President's plan of receiving prescription drug coverage, one must pay a $50 premium per month, or new tax, in order to be involved in the system. You have one choice, one chance…
But his plan is not voluntary. You can voluntarily get in, but when you do not get in, you can't reapply. That is my understanding.
The Senator from Alabama is right. If we look at it, at a time of overtaxation, when American workers are getting up every morning, working hard, and sending this money to Washington, and then it is overtaxed--we are not talking about…





