I rise today to make a few brief remarks about tax cuts and the budget, and the promises that have so tightly entwined the two. The House passed its budget resolution last Friday by a vote of 216 to 204. The House budget plan would cut $101 billion in government spending over the next 5 years. It would also repeal the marriage penalty tax, which has unjustly punished 21 million couples just for getting married. However, the House-passed budget plan failed to provide reconciliation instructions for achieving this tax relief, and failed to provide clear guidance on how to use any budget surpluses. While the efforts by our colleagues in the House represent a move in the right direction, Congress must do better by the taxpayers. It now falls to the conference committee to ensure we keep our promise to offer meaningful tax relief to working Americans. That promise must provide the framework for the budget resolution produced by this Congress. Thanks to the exceptionally healthy economy, our short-term fiscal condition has greatly improved in the past few years, not because of what Congress did--in spite of what Congress did. But it is the economy. In fact, we will soon see a unified budget surplus for the first time since 1969. On May 26, President Clinton announced that this year's budget surplus would be $39 billion.
Rod Grams: “I rise today to make a few brief remarks about tax cuts and the budget, and the promises that have so tightly entwined…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax cuts and the House budget resolution during a floor speech.
Share
More from Rod Grams
My understanding is that in order to be a part of the Vice President's plan of receiving prescription drug coverage, one must pay a $50 premium per month, or new tax, in order to be involved in the system. You have one choice, one chance…
We have tried, but we have not had it scored yet and have not been able to get the numbers, but some of the projections we have say it will be under $40 billion a year, not the 258 or 253 the Vice President is talking about.
all I want to say is that if it is justifiable to increase taxes on our senior citizens to help supplement the Social Security system, it would be like increasing taxes on our farmers so we could give them a better farm bill. It would be…
The Senator from Florida is inaccurate because in my own plan, my MEDS program is a copay and also has deductibles built in depending on wages or income. It is worked through Medicare and through the HCFA program. So, no, I do not oppose a…





