in wrapping up the debate this morning, I want to, again, say that I believe the controls we have in place are working. We are taking a step backward if we approve the Cochran-Durbin amendment. The rest of the world is moving forward very fast. Anybody who has bought a computer in the last 2 years knows that technology has already passed them, and they have to look at a new system. But between the 2,000 and the 7,000 MTOPS level, computers are going to become so commonplace that any commercial industry or any office in this country will be able to buy them next year. These are well intended controls but, again, as I say, placed on the wrong levels. These are not supercomputers. These are not computers that countries would be looking for military end use. These are computers that are more for business and office use. I believe that putting any kind of restrictions or recontrolling these would be a step backward in our efforts to provide jobs and assistance.
Rod Grams: “in wrapping up the debate this morning, I want to, again, say that I believe the controls we have in place are working.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Cochran-Durbin amendment on technology controls.
Share
More from Rod Grams
I rise to make a few brief follow-up remarks about the repeal of the unfair and unjust death tax. As I said before, it is the family farms and small business owners that the death taxes particularly harm, not the rich, as our colleagues…
I will take a few minutes this morning to talk about an industry that is very important to the State of Minnesota, and that is our dairy industry. June is National Dairy Month, and I come to the floor today to pay tribute to the family…
Senator Durbin has an amendment at the desk. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Minnesota (Mr. Grams), for Mr. Durbin, proposes an amendment numbered 4362.
I am not opposed to a surcharge or a prescription charge but a charge that is going to assume a new $600-per-year additional tax or cost on our seniors while providing very little in benefit that would overcome that cost.





