I rise to introduce The Department of Energy Abolishment Act of 1999. I am pleased to include as original cosponsors Senator Spencer Abraham and Senator Jon Kyl and want to thank them for their support both this year and in past Congresses. I would also like to say that Congressman Todd Tiahrt will be introducing his DOE elimination bill today in the House of Representatives and I thank him for his continued leadership and cooperation on this issue. As many of my colleagues are aware, the effort to eliminate the DOE is not a new endeavor. In fact, since its inception, experts have been clamoring to eliminate the Department and to move its programs back to the agencies from which they were taken--agencies better suited to achieving specific programmatic goals. When we began to look into the specifics of DOE elimination in the 104th Congress, we considered three main issues. First, we examined the fact that the Department of Energy no longer has a mission--a situation clearly reflected by the fact that nearly 85 percent of its budget is expended upon 'non-energy' programs. The Department was created to develop a long-term energy strategy with an ultimate goal of energy independence. Sadly, we are now far more reliant upon foreign energy sources than we were when the Department was created. During the long oil lines of the 1970s, we were about 35 percent dependent on foreign oil. Today, it is more than 60 percent.
Rod Grams: “I rise to introduce The Department of Energy Abolishment Act of 1999. I am pleased to include as original cosponsors…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing the Department of Energy Abolishment Act of 1999.
Share
More from Rod Grams
As hate-crimes legislation was recently debated and voted on by the United States Senate, I would like to briefly explain my vote on this issue. I believe that all victims of crime, and most certainly victims of violent crime, are…
I wanted to take time before leaving for the weekend to be here to express my strong disappointment with President Clinton and his Democratic allies in the Congress who have once again denied millions of American couples marriage penalty…
Because what we are trying to do is target those who need the help, and that is about 6 or maybe 10 percent of the population. What the Vice President is doing and what you are talking about is bringing 100 percent of Americans under a new…
Not to belabor this debate, and it is good we are talking about it because the American people need to hear it, but over that amount of money you are talking about, we would still have a $25 copay, the $150 deductible, and then no cap at…





