I think, clearly, as the author of the amendment says, he clearly is legislating on an appropriations bill and, therefore, violating clause 2 of rule XI. By his most recent statement, he is expanding penalties for the existing law. The Acting CHAIRMAN. Does anyone else wish to be heard on the point of order?
Share
More from Martin Sabo
So DHS would have to clearly be tracking significantly more money than they track today?
And the chaplain at the Air Force who blew the whistle on this problem is no longer there?
The minister of the church that I go to locally is a former Navy chaplain and also served in the Marines. He felt strongly enough about this issue it was part of his sermon yesterday. His response to the 6-year problem was that if this…
What DHS funding is used today in contravention of section 642(a) of the 1996 Immigration Act?
Other voices in this conversation
