returning to the crop insurance subject, I certainly am pleased that the Republican budget does allow $6 billion for the first 5 years of the budget cycle, but I would point out that it is a 10-year budget and there is nothing for crop insurance in the second 5 years that we have been able to identify. And if we contrast this with the budgets that were proposed by the Democrats and by the Blue Dogs there was, indeed, more adequate and consistent funding for crop insurance. I feel that if we have a 10-year budget here we have to judge it not just on the basis of the first 5 years, but the commitment to crop insurance for the second 5 years. If there is not money there for crop insurance for the second 5 years, we are in a very bad position.
David Minge: “returning to the crop insurance subject, I certainly am pleased that the Republican budget does allow $6 billion for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for crop insurance in the context of the Republican budget proposal.
Share
More from David Minge
This legislation that is considered in the House of Representatives on September 14, 1999, in my opinion is the most important legislation that we take up in this session. It goes to the heart of the political process in America, the…
I joined 30 Democrats in casting a controversial vote last month. I voted to send the Starr report to the Committee on the Judiciary without strict time or subject matter restrictions. I was committed to avoiding partisanship. Tragically…
I urge that we move on to other portions of this bill and recognize that the sugar program has been authorized by Congress. It is a program that is scheduled to continue to the year 2003.
If my colleague would allow me to interrupt for a moment, he referred to the energy costs and tax cuts. I had a very interesting experience just this last week. I visited a small trucking company, and the founder of the trucking company…





