The fact is that when there is an instance where there is a conservation action that may take place with regard to wilderness designation or park designation, we have a group of individuals in this country that will go on seeking mineral leasing, seeking permits, simply with the effort to in fact frustrate, and at great expense to the taxpayer. We have to go back at that particular point if we want to achieve the conservation, the preservation of that land, and pay for what the taxpayer already owns, that is, the Federal Government already has. We have to go back and pay, basically, in essence being blackmailed in these instances in order to conserve these lands. That is wrong.
Bruce F. Vento: “The fact is that when there is an instance where there is a conservation action that may take place with regard to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of conservation actions related to wilderness and park designations.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
Mr. Speaker, I concur in the ranking member's remarks and the subcommittee chairman's remarks concerning this bill. ... we have to go back and make some modifications to clarify intent and to eliminate ambiguity.
In the face of growing public sentiment and outcry for more greenspace and wildlands, Congress must push forward an agenda that all of America can support--protection and expansion of America's Wilderness Preservation System.
He has also demonstrated his commitment to public service by founding the Children's Health Enrichment Program in St. Paul.
This program is extremely competitive, choosing individuals who have demonstrated excellence in community service, leadership, academic and professional achievement.





