I appreciate that. I was about to explain that I was catching up with what is to be offered beyond that. What was in the bill I was accurate about. What was in the amendment right now I am accurate about, right now with regard to 'associated with.' These definitions have a great confusion with regard to property right, and it would end up in court. I appreciate the fact that the gentleman is going to further perfect the manager's amendment with the Stenholm amendment, but I want to just point out that I think I was accurate, and tried to be accurate. The fact is we have enough differences of opinion that we do not have to argue about that which is factually correct.
Bruce F. Vento: “I appreciate that. I was about to explain that I was catching up with what is to be offered beyond that. What was in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the accuracy of definitions in a bill and its amendment.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
I rise with specific concerns regards the Energy and Water Appropriation measure. When conference with the Senate was sought the full House accepted my instruction which put the House on record in opposition to the Senate provision regards…
I think a well-crafted law on concessions here, very prescriptive, not leaving a lot of room obviously could present some problems to any administrator, including Secretary of Interior Babbitt or his successors. But most of these laws are…
As we consider the Department of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2001, a simple question comes to mind. Do we, or do we not care about the needs of hard working American families? By…
As a White House Fellow for the U.S. Department of Education, Dr. England assists in the Safe and Drug-Free School program.





