Mr. Chairman, I have discussed this amendment with the gentleman from Kansas [Mr. Roberts]. The gentleman from California [Mr. Miller] raises a very good question. When I first heard about the amendment, I put the gentleman on notice that I would have to make a point of order against the amendment because it would be establishing an entitlement. The gentleman went and checked, as I checked, and found out that indeed this is an entitlement. There is no guarantee that the States and local governments will ever get a nickel out of this language. It is mainly an authorization to appropriate money for that purpose. And if we never appropriate a nickel, the States and local communities will still have to put their money out, because if they do not put their money out to do this, they will not get money under this bill to educate the at-risk children in their school district from the Federal Government. Mr. Chairman, there is a cutoff if they fail to gather the information, but there is no cutoff of the requirement to gather the information if they fail to get the money. And that is the very strange situation.
William Ford: “Mr. Chairman, I have discussed this amendment with the gentleman from Kansas [Mr. Roberts]. The gentleman from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about an amendment related to funding for at-risk children during a committee meeting.
Share
More from William Ford
I rise in opposition to the amendment. The authors of the amendment, the gentleman from Iowa, Minnesota, Ohio, and California, have an admirable aim: to maintain discipline in the budget and prevent increases in the deficit as we provide…
H.R. 6 is the eighth reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 [ESEA]. With the possible exception of the 1978 House consideration of ESEA, the number of amendments offered on the House floor to that act during…
We do not believe it is right to have little children in public schools enlisted to be spies against other members of their families, no matter who pays for it. We do not care whether it is funded or unfunded. It is immoral. It is wrong.
I am looking now, Mr. Chairman, at section 432 of the General Education Provisions Act, which was passed in 1970, and does not come up for reauthorization. It is permanent law, unless somebody introduces legislation to change it. In this…





