Mr. Walker, I think what a ``no'' vote means is that those Members are unwilling to take the accountability and responsibility for the integrity and the honor of the House and that they are willing to let some outside agency bear that responsibility. Again, an abdication of their role as a Member of this House is how I would interpret a ``no'' vote.
The speaker discusses the implications of voting 'no' on accountability in the House.
Share
More from Pete Hoekstra
I’m trying to tell Canadians and give them an insight into exactly what the president of the United States thinks.
The vote that’s going to happen in October is a decision for the people of Alberta.
We're monitoring it, we're evaluating it and if some of it becomes election interference then America will respond to it.
If (the referendum) is going to be influenced by governments, it’s going to be influenced by the government of Alberta and by the federal government, and maybe the other provinces, but not by the United States government.
Other voices in this conversation
