It went on to say that the decree embodies the consent of the Union defendants to governmental supervision, not the consent of Congress. The consent decree states that the Federal Government has the option of running the Teamsters election and references Government financing with a 1996 opinion. It is silent on the issue of funding beyond 1996. Therefore, it is the prerogative of Congress to speak at this time. We need to make sure that we have accountability for taxpayer dollars, ensure honesty and integrity in the election process and facilitate learning. Now is the time to step up and protect the taxpayer dollars and to ensure and put together a process to give the Teamsters a fair election.
Pete Hoekstra: “It went on to say that the decree embodies the consent of the Union defendants to governmental supervision, not the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for Congressional oversight in the Teamsters election process.
Share
More from Pete Hoekstra
If (the referendum) is going to be influenced by governments, it’s going to be influenced by the government of Alberta and by the federal government, and maybe the other provinces, but not by the United States government.
Compared to a provincial government and Canadian taxpayers running (political) ads in the United States of America? You’re equating those two? C’mon, that’s not even close!
We have found over the last couple of decades that one of the best places in the world to get oil from is Canada.
We're monitoring it, we're evaluating it and if some of it becomes election interference then America will respond to it.





