In 1998 and 1999, the Department of Education failed its financial audit. That means that the independent auditors who came in and took a look at the financial records of the Department of Education indicated that the way the numbers were presented and the background, the records that the Department of Education has, the procedures that it has in place and the interim controls that it has in place, gave the auditors some reason of doubt that the way the numbers were actually presented in the financial statements perhaps did not accurately reflect the expenditures and the flow of revenue throughout the Department. Coming from the private sector, I know that when the financial auditors come in and put some disclaimers in or do not give an organization a clean bill of health, it sets off a number of alarm bells. Because, basically, what the auditors are saying is that in this environment, without the proper financial controls in place, an environment is created that is ripe for waste, fraud, and abuse.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing oversight hearings on the Department of Education's financial audit failures.
Share
More from Pete Hoekstra
Hopefully on a number of these issues we reach resolution sooner rather than later, but it's already taken 14 months and we haven't seen significant progress.
I think it’s important that people realize this, okay? Because I hear it all the time. What does America have to do with this? We paid for the bridge. It’s our bridge. Just open it.
If the pollution is so bad that it’s dangerous to the players or it’s dangerous to the fans, the first person to say don’t hold the game will be the President of the United States.
Both the U.S. and Canadian governments look forward to getting the bridge open, but have recognized that there are some issues that are outstanding that need to be ironed out.





