I want to express my strong support for the Barton-Tauzin substitute which requires a balanced budget in 1997 and includes a cap on taxes. During the course of this debate, I have heard many argue that a balanced budget amendment is not necessary. But as the previous speaker so eloquently pointed out, this Congress cannot control spending. It is following in the steps of 40 years of Democratic control, where we continue to spend more than what we are willing to demand from the American taxpayers who send to Washington. I call out to my freshman colleagues, the new Members of the 103d Congress, that this is our opportunity to let the American people know that this Congress is different than the 19 Congresses before it; that we are willing to control spending; that we will vote for a balanced budget amendment; and that we will no longer burden the next generation with additional debt and more interest, money that we cannot afford. I strongly rise in support of this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Expressing support for a balanced budget amendment during a debate on fiscal responsibility.
Share
More from Pete Hoekstra
We've got a few little issues to work out," Hoekstra said. "We've got to figure out this bridge thing. We've got to figure out some tariffs.… We're going to get over this. We're going to get through it."
The Morouns operate a significant business in the United States, and in the United States, companies involved in those kinds of businesses donate to all kinds of campaigns
As long as the president of the United States think I’m doing a good job, I’ll be here.
You get calls and request to meet with folks and… if they’re people that are working on issues that may have an impact on U.S. relations, there’s a good chance we’ll meet with them, just to get some kind of perspective.





