Remember, this is the model that says the taxpayer puts in a dollar and 60 to 65 cents makes it to the classroom. On the other hand, this model says we have gotten rid of all this stuff in the middle and the taxpayer puts in $2, and it only costs the government a dollar. So here we grow our investment in education and we grow it for all students, public schools, private, parochial schools, we grow the dollar. In this one we shrink it. What a sharp contrast.
On the recordJune 11, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding models for education during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Pete Hoekstra
Jul 5, 2026
The bridge is obviously going to open," Hoekstra told CBC News and the New York Times at the July 4 party. "We all want it open. There are some things that we're working through and we'll get those resolved I think relatively quickly."
Jul 7, 2026
We have a bridge that has come in significantly over budget and has come in significantly later than originally forecast. That has changed the business model.
Jul 22, 2026
Compared to a provincial government and Canadian taxpayers running (political) ads in the United States of America? You’re equating those two? C’mon, that’s not even close!





