the Johnson amendment requires the EPA to change the testing procedures that auto companies use to determine the fuel economy numbers that go on the dealer label. Her amendment requires auto companies to do one test for labeling and a separate test for CAFE. The language in this amendment costs the companies approximately twice as much as the simpler testing they are doing now. This goes to the heart of what we are doing to the auto industry now, unintentionally perhaps, and that is beating up on them; and we should not do that. The Rogers amendment deals with the need for improved dealer label accuracy, while only requiring one test. Instead of requiring the EPA to change testing procedures, the Rogers amendment requires the EPA to change the adjustment factors that the EPA currently uses to make the fuel economy label accurate. This is the way to go. It achieves the goal we all want to have, accuracy, in a much more reasonable and a much less expensive way. It is not a fudge.
John Schwarz: “the Johnson amendment requires the EPA to change the testing procedures that auto companies use to determine the fuel…”
Share
More from John Schwarz
while I credit my colleague from Michigan for doing a great deal of work on this bill, and I know it is a tremendously difficult bill, rail passenger service in the United States is the worst in all of the industrialized world. It does not…
We want companies to bend the knee — we've been kissing the ring our entire lives. It's time to turn that around.
section 215 of the PATRIOT Act pertains to the government's abilities to gain access to what we commonly refer to as business records, records compiled by a business or an institution pertaining to a customer or visitor to that entity…
I thank the gentleman. Is it also the case that the recipient of such an order, such as a business or video store, is allowed to consult a lawyer and to contest these orders, and that judges are authorized to review such challenge? In…





