So we do not know what the court was doing. It is not clear, depending on what someone's interpretation is. Well, let me ask you this. The amendment allows the recipient to challenge the letter in court, but it can be quashed only if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive to the recipient? {time} 1600
John Conyers: “So we do not know what the court was doing. It is not clear, depending on what someone's interpretation is. Well, let me…”
Share
More from John Conyers
Members of the House, this amendment makes a bad bill even worse. To begin with, it would prohibit cy-pres distributions pursuant to which parties attempt to find the next best use of funds that remain after a class action settlement has…
Now, as you and all of us are aware, President Trump has repeatedly promised to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants.
I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. McEachin). Mr. McEACHIN. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to share Denise's story. Already a mother of two young children, Denise was expecting her third child…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan will be postponed. Announcement by the Acting Chair The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to…





