May I respond to my colleague on the Committee on the Judiciary by saying that there are relatively rare instances where a defense counsel is paid on a contingency basis except that the way that they are paid is contingent upon an outcome as well. So in the larger sense, I want to just make sure that we have everybody wearing the same restriction, to the extent that that is possible. By the way, I want to commend the gentleman, I understand that civil rights litigation is excluded from this provision. I think that is a very thoughtful provision. I would hope that the gentleman would accept this perfecting amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing payment structures for defense counsel and civil rights litigation during a Judiciary Committee meeting.
Share
More from John Conyers
You got a good point, but we are going to be able to get it passed. Let's let it go to the courts.
Although H.R. 469 has many flaws, I am particularly concerned that the bill's broad and ill-defined requirements would effectively delay and possibly deter civil enforcement agencies from providing general relief in discrimination cases…
Yes, they tell me there is a chance it could very well be struck down. But we will go ahead and run that risk.
In my role as a member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, I have always taken a serious view of my oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigations. It is vitally important that we keep a close watch on the activities of law…





