reclaiming my time, no, what we are dealing with is document retention. We deal with audit review, statute of limitations, whistleblower protection, and sentencing enhancement. If the gentleman from California (Mr. Cox) is confused on this, there may be some other Members that are not clear on this. We are talking about document retention, statute of limitations, whistleblower protection, and sentencing enhancement only. We are not reducing any time for shredding or anything else.
John Conyers: “reclaiming my time, no, what we are dealing with is document retention. We deal with audit review, statute of…”
On the recordJuly 17, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing issues related to document retention and legal protections during a House debate.
Share
More from John Conyers
Mar 11, 2019
Yes, they tell me there is a chance it could very well be struck down. But we will go ahead and run that risk.
Oct 24, 2017
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan will be postponed. Announcement by the Acting Chair The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to…
Oct 25, 2017
My amendment would exempt from H.R. 469 settlement agreements and consent decrees intended to prevent discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, or other protected category. Given the often systemic nature of discriminatory…





