in closing, the loser pays is a phrase that appeals to everyone who has heard it. It removes itself to anecdotes about court cases that appeared or produced an absurd or abusive outcome, but government by anecdote can produce disastrous policy. Although the Contract With America claims that the loser pays provision is intended to penalize frivolous lawsuits and discourage the filing of weak cases, it is almost certain to have adverse consequences which limit access to justice. The Harman amendment to recommit essentially cushions some of the worst features that now exist in the bill, and, as I have said before, it duplicates the bill on securities litigation by adopting the very same standard. Please support the motion to recommit this bill.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the 'loser pays' provision in a bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Conyers
I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. McEachin). Mr. McEACHIN. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to share Denise's story. Already a mother of two young children, Denise was expecting her third child…
We should of course remain vigilant about pay-for-delay schemes, whereby branded drug manufacturers pay generic manufacturers to delay the entry of a version of branded drugs as the patent on the branded drug expires.
Since the Trump administration has come into being, briefing requests submitted by Democratic Members' staff have been repeatedly denied, ignored, or delayed.
The policies that I've just mentioned, that President Trump has repeatedly promised to deport 11 million, all 11 million undocumented immigrants.





