Here is a new piece of historic information just in about James Madison that may appeal to my colleagues. Actually, they tried a supermajority, and I think they will all find this very interesting. Because under the Articles of Confederation in the 1780s, there was a provision for a supermajority. Adopting a supermajority tax requirement would repeat the very same mistakes made in the 1780s under the Articles of Confederation between the Declaration of Independence and the adoption of a constitution. Under these articles, it required a vote of nine of the 13 States to raise revenue, a supermajority. It is because the system worked so poorly that the Founding Fathers sought to fashion a national government that could operate through majority rule. So, Mr. Speaker, we would be ignoring a very important fundamental part of our history if we were to give in this area James Madison too hard a way to go. In fact, in the present circumstances, this amendment would take more votes to close a tax loophole engineered by powerful interest groups than to cut Social Security, Medicare and education programs.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a supermajority tax requirement and its historical context.
Share
More from John Conyers
I ask respectfully that we include relevant officials from the Department of Defense and the Air Force.
I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. McEachin). Mr. McEACHIN. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to share Denise's story. Already a mother of two young children, Denise was expecting her third child…
It is incontrovertible that the United States since its founding has been a Nation of immigrants.
Members of the House, this amendment makes a bad bill even worse. To begin with, it would prohibit cy-pres distributions pursuant to which parties attempt to find the next best use of funds that remain after a class action settlement has…





