Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 6, 1995
the gentleman from Ohio's amendment presents a number of important and potentially troubling issues. Most significant, it avoids even the semblance of evenhandedness by only limiting the fees plaintiff's attorneys could receive. What about the defendant counsel's fees? What about making this apply to plaintiff's attorneys as well as defense attorneys? The amendment creates a new set of controls on lawyers. It discards our Nation's long-cherished notion of freedom of contract, and instead imposes a set of Government-controlled fee schedules. I think this is 100 percent at odds with the free market beliefs of many of my friends on the other side of the aisle. The gentleman from Ohio's amendment would also create a potentially significant conflict of interest before the attorney and his client. It would also discourage settlements, because attorneys could not receive the fee that he or she had bargained for if the case settles. Perhaps the most serious problem is that the Hoke amendment would limit a plaintiff's right to pay his attorney while imposing no similar limitation on the defendant's right to pay his attorney. As a result, this perfecting amendment would specify that defense counsel are subject to the same limitations as are imposed on plaintiff's counsel. My perfecting amendment would specify that defense counsel are subject to the same limitations as are the plaintiff's counsel. Would the gentleman consider accepting the amendment?
Said by
John Conyers
Democratic · Michigan

Editor's note · Context

Discussing concerns about an amendment limiting fees for plaintiff's attorneys.

Share

More from John Conyers

Mar 11, 2019

Yes, they tell me there is a chance it could very well be struck down. But we will go ahead and run that risk.

congress.gov
Oct 24, 2017

I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Michigan will be postponed. Announcement by the Acting Chair The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to…

govinfo.gov
Oct 31, 2017

Rather than the rule of law, anti-immigrant ideology is guiding immigration court policy under the Trump administration.

congress.gov
Oct 25, 2017

Since the Trump administration has come into being, briefing requests submitted by Democratic Members' staff have been repeatedly denied, ignored, or delayed.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation